Collecting the setup from Episode 2 — even that 1/137 wasn't a fixed value
In Episode 2 we said the fine-structure constant \(\alpha\approx 1/137\) is "the same for anyone measuring anywhere in the universe, an unchanging number" — and planted a small bomb in the closing footnote: "\(\alpha\) actually changes a little depending on how finely you look (the energy)." This time we collect on that setup. 1/137 is only the value when you look at the coarsest scale. This fact changes the very way we pose the ultimate question, "why 1/137?" From here on, the series steps for the first time into "territory nobody yet knows the answer to."
An electron carries negative charge. But look "right up close" to the electron and the story isn't so simple. In the quantum world, even empty vacuum constantly fluctuates: for a very short time, pairs of "an electron and an anti-electron (positron)" pop into existence and vanish. These pairs line up with a preferred orientation around the original electron, and like a thin cloak they slightly hide (screen) its charge.
So from far away (coarsely), the electron's charge looks slightly weakened by this cloak. But get very close (finely), slip inside the cloak, and you see the true, stronger charge that isn't hidden. The closer you get, the stronger the charge looks — that's what "the electron is hazy" means.
\(\alpha\) is the number for the strength of the electron's charge (Episode 2's \(\alpha=e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar c\), where \(e\) is the amount of charge). If the charge looks stronger, \(\alpha\) grows. As in the last section, the more finely (higher energy) you look, the stronger the charge looks — so —
Look coarsely (low energy, everyday world) → \(\alpha \approx \dfrac{1}{137}\)
Look finely (high energy, around the \(Z\) particle's mass ~91 GeV) → \(\alpha \approx \dfrac{1}{128}\)
\(1/137\) and \(1/128\). It looks like a small difference, but it's a fact confirmed by measurement. Slam electrons together at high energy in a particle accelerator and \(\alpha\) genuinely takes the larger, \(1/128\)-side value. In physics, such a "quantity whose value changes with how finely you look" is called a running coupling constant. A constant that runs — the "gap between name and reality" we saw in Episode 4 and the bonus episodes shows up here too.
The two values as decimals
$$\frac{1}{137}\approx 0.00730,\qquad \frac{1}{128}\approx 0.00781$$The fractional increase
$$\frac{0.00781-0.00730}{0.00730}\approx 0.07 = 7\%$$From the coarse view to the fine view, \(\alpha\) grew by about 7%. Far from an "unchanging constant," it moves nearly a tenth just by changing how finely you look. In the figure below, actually raise the energy and watch \(\alpha\) grow.
Here's Part 1's conclusion. If \(\alpha\) moves with how finely you look, then "why is \(\alpha\) equal to \(1/137\)?" was a bit too naive a question — because \(1/137\) is just one value among many, "the value in the everyday coarse world." Reposed correctly, it becomes this.
✗ "Why is \(\alpha\) equal to \(1/137\)?"
✓ "Where do how \(\alpha\) runs with fineness (the rule of the running) and the value that pins it down at one point come from?"
So what we should really ask about is not a single number but the "way of running" itself. The value changes with fineness, but "by what rule it changes" is something deeper, independent of that fineness — and that is the candidate for the "unchanging essence." The idea this series has repeated since Episode 1 — "not the surface value that moves with units or viewpoint, but the invariant structure behind it, is what physics is" — works just the same at the entrance to \(\alpha\)'s mystery.
The "rule of \(\alpha\)'s running" can be computed from theory (quantum field theory). That part is understood. But the value that pins that running down at one point — "why that value?" — no one yet knows. Ever since the great physicist Eddington failed to derive \(137\) from theory alone, it has stayed unsolved for nearly a century.
Here the series steps, for the first time, outside "what clicks." But there was a payoff — we reposed the question from "why 1/137" to "where do the running and its fixed point come from," into its correct form. A good question is half the answer.
Because vacuum fluctuations thinly hide the electron's charge, the finer (higher energy) you look, the stronger the charge appears, and \(\alpha\) grows about 7% from \(1/137\) to \(1/128\). \(\alpha\) was "a running quantity that changes with how finely you look" — the identity of the setup planted in Episode 2's footnote.
So "why \(1/137\)" was too naive a question. Correctly: "where do the rule of the running, and the value that fixes it, come from?" The value moves, but the running is deep — the "invariant structure behind, not the surface" that this series has consistently sought shows its face at the entrance to \(\alpha\)'s greatest mystery too. Having reposed the question well, we close Part 1.
Print / save as PDF: ⌘+P (Ctrl+P on Windows). On screen, raising the energy with the slider makes α grow. "Show answer" opens the solutions.