Cosmology That ClicksEpisode 2 · the math-friendly edition

Last time: light used to be faster → This time: 1/137, the star of that footnote, takes center stage

The 1/137 Hidden Inside the Atom The electron in a hydrogen atom orbits at one-137th the speed of light.
Absolute speeds change depending on who measures — yet this one ratio is the same for everyone. Why?

Tools you'll need: fractions, division, exponents, canceling units \(\alpha = v/c \approx 1/137\)

Last time, we rewrote cosmic expansion as "the speed of light slowly drops." In the closing footnote, one number that never moves made an appearance — the fine-structure constant \(\alpha\approx 1/137\). The speed of light, lengths, energies — their values all shift depending on how you measure. But \(\alpha\) alone comes out to \(1/137\) no matter who measures it, in any units. This time we'll verify, by hand, how this strange number shows up as a "speed ratio" inside the atom.

STEP 01The startling fact — the electron orbits at 1/137 the speed of light

A hydrogen atom is the simplest atom: one electron circling a single proton at the center. In the simple model built by the physicist Bohr, the speed \(v\) of the innermost orbiting electron can be written using the speed of light \(c\) like this:

Speed of the ground-state electron in hydrogen
$$v = \alpha\, c,\qquad \alpha \approx \frac{1}{137}$$

So the electron orbits at exactly one-137th the speed of light. In everyday terms, about 2,200 km/s — blazingly fast, but only 1/137 of light's speed (300,000 km/s). The name of this "one-137th" ratio is the fine-structure constant \(\alpha\). Written out, it's built from a combination of several fundamental constants:

$$\alpha = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0\,\hbar\, c}$$

Here \(e\) is the electron's charge, \(\varepsilon_0\) a constant describing the vacuum, \(\hbar\) the Planck constant (the basic unit of the quantum world), and \(c\) the speed of light. It looks scary at first glance, but the key point is this: multiply and divide all of it together and the units vanish, leaving just a number. We'll check that in the next step.

STEP 02Try it — does it really come out to "just a number"?

In physics, "a quantity with units" and "a number with the units gone" are in different leagues. A number with the units gone (a dimensionless quantity) has the same value whether you use meters or inches — the same for anyone, anywhere in the universe. Let's confirm by hand that \(\alpha\) belongs to that club.

Try it — compute α and get 1/137

Values we'll use (SI units)

\(e = 1.602\times10^{-19}\ \mathrm{C}\), \(\varepsilon_0 = 8.854\times10^{-12}\ \mathrm{F/m}\), \(\hbar = 1.055\times10^{-34}\ \mathrm{J\cdot s}\), \(c = 2.998\times10^{8}\ \mathrm{m/s}\).

Numerator and denominator separately

$$\text{numerator}=e^2=(1.602\times10^{-19})^2 \approx 2.566\times10^{-38}$$ $$\text{denominator}=4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar c \approx 4\pi(8.854\times10^{-12})(1.055\times10^{-34})(2.998\times10^{8})$$

Working the denominator out step by step gives \(\approx 3.517\times10^{-36}\). Therefore

$$\alpha = \frac{2.566\times10^{-38}}{3.517\times10^{-36}} \approx 7.30\times10^{-3} = \frac{1}{137}.$$

What happened to the units?

The numerator is \(\mathrm{C^2}\); the denominator is \(\mathrm{(F/m)(J\cdot s)(m/s)}\). Recalling \(\mathrm{F=C^2/J}\) and canceling, every unit cleanly cancels out. What remains is the pure number \(1/137\). Switch from meters to feet and this value doesn't move a hair.

Why is "units vanishing" such a big deal? Recall last time's footnote. "The speed of light slowed down" changes meaning depending on the measurer's ruler — because it carries units. But \(\alpha\) has its units gone, so it depends on no ruler at all. That's exactly why it's the only kind of quantity for which "did it really change?" can be put to an experiment.

STEP 031/137 is the ratio "how finely you must look before relativity shows up in the atom"

There's a second way to read \(\alpha=v/c\). When something approaches the speed of light, Einstein's relativistic effects (like time dilation) kick in. Far below the speed of light, relativity can be ignored. The gauge of "how much relativity matters" is precisely \(v/c\).

For the hydrogen electron, \(v/c=\alpha=1/137\) — so it's only slightly relativistic. That "slightly" splits the color of the light the atom emits by a tiny amount (fine structure). The size of the split scales roughly as \(\alpha^2\). Let's work it out.

Try it — how small is the relativistic shift?

Scale of the relativistic correction

$$\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2 = \alpha^2 = \left(\frac{1}{137}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{18769} \approx 5.3\times10^{-5}$$

About one part in twenty thousand. That's roughly the fraction of an atom's energy that the tiny relativistic shift accounts for. Small — but a precise spectrometer sees it clearly. This is the origin of "fine structure," the tiny splitting of spectral lines. The ratio 1/137 is carved right into the fine detail of the light's color.

The reveal (linking to the next episode) "Look coarsely (ignore relativity) and the atom is simple; look finely and relativity's shift appears" — this feeling that physics changes with resolution carries straight into the next episode, "Schrödinger's equation is the world with the speed of light set to infinity." Set \(c\to\infty\) and \(v/c\to 0\): the relativistic shift goes to zero, and the simplest quantum mechanics is what's left.
◇ ◇ ◇

STEP 04Absolute scales move; only the ratio stays put

This is the most important part of the episode — and the heart of last time's footnote. The atom's "size" and the electron's "speed" themselves are, in fact, quantities that can shift depending on how you measure (which units you pick). But take their ratio, and the moving parts cancel cleanly, leaving only the immovable number \(\alpha\).

For example, take the gauge of atomic size, the "Bohr radius \(a_0\)," and another fundamental length of the electron, the "Compton wavelength \(\lambda_C\)." Their ratio is

$$\frac{\lambda_C}{a_0} = \alpha \approx \frac{1}{137}.$$

Each length shifts depending on the speed of light and the choice of units. But the instant you make it a ratio, the units and the moving parts vanish, and only \(1/137\) shows its face. When we said last time "even if light slows, \(\alpha\) is invariant," this is exactly it — even if \(c\) moves, the other constants move along with it, and the ratio \(\alpha\) does not.

The one line linking last time and this time

Quantities with units (speed of light, lengths, energies) shift with the measurer's "ledger." The unit-free ratio \(\alpha\) is "a property of the universe itself," coming out \(1/137\) for anyone. Only the latter is something physics can truly ask about.

The honest line — 1/137 is not a number anyone has "derived"

Why \(\alpha\) is exactly 1/137 is, in truth, something nobody yet knows. It's one of the greatest mysteries in physics. Long ago the great physicist Eddington tried to derive this number from theory alone, and failed spectacularly. For now, \(\alpha\) is an "input value fixed by measurement," not something computable from anything more fundamental.

To be even more honest: \(\alpha\) actually changes a little depending on "how finely you look" (at high energy it's about \(1/128\), not \(1/137\)). So strictly, "1/137 is the value of \(\alpha\) when you look at the coarsest scale." We'll cover this "running" in a later episode.

STEP 05Is it really immovable? — the atomic clock as evidence

If we're going to claim "\(\alpha\) doesn't move," there ought to be an experiment that checked. There is. It's a precision experiment: line up atomic clocks of different types and, over a long time, compare the ratio of their ticking rates. If \(\alpha\) moved even a little, the clocks' rhythms would drift apart.

The answer from the latest experiments: \(\alpha\)'s change is less than \(10^{-19}\) per year — a staggering precision, smaller than "one trillionth of one hundred-millionth per year." Recall last time's universe (light changing by a fraction \(7.2\times10^{-11}\) per year): if only \(c\) changed while the others stayed fixed, \(\alpha\) would move at that same rate — instantly contradicting this experiment. So last time's universe must be one where "if \(c\) moves, the other constants move along and \(\alpha\) stays invariant." This episode is the very justification for last time's footnote.

Practice problems (solvable with just this and the last episode)
  1. Find the hydrogen electron's speed in km/s from \(v=\alpha c\) and \(c=3.0\times10^{5}\ \mathrm{km/s}\).
    Show answer
    \(v=\dfrac{1}{137}\times 3.0\times10^{5} \approx 2.2\times10^{3}\ \mathrm{km/s}\). About 2,200 km/s — just 1/137 of the speed of light.
  2. Express the relativistic-correction scale \((v/c)^2=\alpha^2\) as a fraction and a decimal. Roughly what fraction of the atom's energy is it?
    Show answer
    \(\alpha^2=(1/137)^2=1/18769\approx 5.3\times10^{-5}\). About one part in twenty thousand.
  3. If \(\alpha\) drifted at \(7.2\times10^{-11}\) per year like last episode's universe, how many orders of magnitude larger is that than the atomic-clock limit of \(10^{-19}\)/yr?
    Show answer
    \(7.2\times10^{-11}\div 10^{-19}=7.2\times10^{8}\) — about 8–9 orders of magnitude larger. So a "only-\(c\)-moves" universe instantly contradicts experiment, and the other constants must move along to keep \(\alpha\) invariant.

Wrap-up1/137 is the universe's "unchanging point"

The speed of light, lengths, energies — all "ledger numbers" that shift with how you measure. But \(\alpha=v/c\approx 1/137\), as their ratio, is the same for anyone, anytime — a number of the universe itself, carved inside the atom. The star of the footnote from Episode 1, "even if light slows, only \(\alpha\) stays put," we found this time inside the atom.

And the greatest mystery remains: why exactly one-137th? Nobody yet knows. Maybe you'll be the one to solve it — physics leaves quite a few open doors like this, on purpose.

This is Episode 2 of "Cosmology That Clicks," a reading piece for curious high-schoolers. The Bohr-model relations \(v=\alpha c\), \(\alpha=e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar c\), and \(\lambda_C/a_0=\alpha\) are correct, and the numbers are approximate. Because \(\alpha\) varies with energy scale (a "running coupling"), \(1/137\) is its low-energy limiting value. "Why \(\alpha\approx1/137\)" is an unsolved problem in modern physics. — To print, use your browser's Print → Save as PDF (in the printed version, answers are hidden so it works as a problem set).

Print / save as PDF: ⌘+P (Ctrl+P on Windows). Printing hides the answers, turning it into a problem set. On screen, tap "Show answer" to open them.