Force That ClicksBonus: The Speed of Force ② (trilogy, part 2)

Speed ①: a change travels at c → Speed ②: why "exactly" c

Why the Speed of Light A change in force travels at exactly \(c\) because the carrier has zero mass.
What if the carrier is heavy? ── the force reaches only nearby. But "short range" is not "slow."

Tools needed: Speed ①, Ep. 6 Yukawa λ=ℏ/mc range ≠ speed

In Speed ① we saw that "a change in force travels at the speed of light \(c\)." But why exactly \(c\)? And what happens when the carrier is heavy, as with the weak force? Here we clearly dissect the most common mix-up ── "range (how far it reaches)" and "speed (how fast it travels)" are different things. The carrier's mass sets the range, but the speed of a change is kept at \(c\) as a ceiling for any carrier. Meeting Yukawa again from Episode 6 (\(\lambda=\hbar/mc\)), we separate these two.

01A massless carrier ── exactly c, and it reaches infinitely far

When the carrier of a force (Episode 6) has zero mass, the change in its field travels at exactly the speed of light, and the force reaches out to infinity. The photon (electromagnetism), the gluon, and the graviton (hypothetical) are these. In Episode 6's \(\lambda=\hbar/mc\), if \(m\to0\) then \(\lambda\to\infty\) (infinite range), and Episode 10's inverse-square \(1/r^2\) was also a consequence of this "zero mass + long range." So both electromagnetism and gravity reach far, and their change chases you at \(c\) (the Sun story from Speed ①). Zero mass ↔ speed \(c\) ↔ infinite range is one packaging.

02A heavy carrier ── the range shrinks. But the speed doesn't

So what happens when the carrier is heavy, as with the weak force (W, Z)? As Episode 6 says, the range \(\lambda=\hbar/mc\) becomes much shorter (W and Z are about 90 times heavier than a proton, so the force reaches a range far smaller than an atomic nucleus). Here is where many people go wrong ── "short range = travels slowly." This is a mistake. Even with a heavy carrier, the speed at which the leading edge of the change (the news) advances still does not exceed \(c\); effectively it is \(c\). What mass changes is how far it reaches (range), not how fast it travels (speed).

The heart of it ── range and speed are different

What the carrier's mass \(m\) sets is the range \(\lambda=\hbar/mc\) (how far it reaches).
The speed at which a change travels is capped at \(c\) regardless of mass (causality, Speed ①).
So "the weak force is short-range," but that doesn't mean "the weak force is slow." Near does not mean slow.

In the figure below, try changing the carrier's mass. Raise the mass and the force's envelope (the range it reaches) shrinks visibly, yet the change's leading edge (the position of the news) stays in the same place ── that is, the speed doesn't change. You can see range and speed move independently.

Figure: the spread of a change in force. Raise the carrier's mass and the range it reaches (blue envelope = range λ=ℏ/mc) shrinks, but the leading edge (red = position of the news = speed c) doesn't move. Range ≠ speed.
range it reaches (range λ = changes with mass) leading edge of the change (speed c = constant)

03Why "range" and "speed" are different

Intuitively ── range is about "how much force a static source can keep exerting on its surroundings." A heavy carrier can "borrow" time only briefly (the uncertainty of Episode 6) and cannot travel far on its errand, so the range is short. Speed, on the other hand, is about "when a change occurs at the source, how fast that news gets there." The news (information), whether the carrier is heavy or light, cannot cross the causal wall of \(c\). How far (range) and how fast (speed) are, from the start, different questions.

A connecting voice ── binding Ep. 6 and Ep. 10 into one In Episode 6 we saw "the carrier's mass sets the range (\(\lambda=\hbar/mc\))," in Episode 10 "zero mass + three dimensions gives inverse-square," and in Speed ① "a change is \(c\)." This time we bundle them into one ── mass sets the range, and \(c\) is common to all as the ceiling on speed. Zero mass gives infinite range + inverse-square + change at \(c\). Heavy gives short range + change still at most \(c\). The three episodes mesh here without contradiction.

◇ ◇ ◇

04What peeling revealed ── mass sets the range, c sets the speed

The conclusion of The Speed of Force ②. A change in force is exactly \(c\) because the carrier has zero mass. When the carrier is heavy, the range shrinks, but the speed of the change stays \(c\). "Zero mass ↔ \(c\) ↔ infinite range" is one package, and giving it mass shrinks only the range, leaving the speed untouched. The mix-up that "the weak force is short-range, so it's slow" confuses range and speed ── these two were different questions from the start.

The honest line

Strictly, the real particles of a heavy carrier (actual W and Z particles) have mass, so they move slower than light. However, the speed at which the "leading edge (the front of the signal)" of a change in force advances (the front velocity) does not exceed \(c\) even with mass; \(c\) is the ceiling. "A change is at most \(c\) (it does not cross the wall of effectively \(c\))" is the accurate way to say it, and the conclusion that "short range ≠ slow" is unchanged (we don't go into the distinctions among wave speeds like phase velocity and group velocity here).

The figure is a schematic reproducing only the key point that "the range shrinks with mass, but the position of the change's leading edge (= the speed) is unchanged"; it is not a numerical computation of actual field propagation. The leading edge's position is drawn as the point reached after a fixed time.

Practice problems
  1. For forces whose change travels at exactly the speed of light \(c\), what do their carriers have in common?
    See the answer
    The carrier has zero mass (photon, gluon, graviton). Zero mass ↔ speed c ↔ infinite range is one package. In Episode 6's λ=ℏ/mc, m→0 gives infinite range.
  2. "The weak force is short-range, so it also travels slowly" ── where is this wrong?
    See the answer
    It confuses range and speed. A heavy carrier makes the range λ=ℏ/mc short, but the speed at which a change travels is capped at c and doesn't change. Near ≠ slow.
  3. What does the carrier's mass set, and what does c set?
    See the answer
    Mass sets the range (how far it reaches, λ=ℏ/mc). c sets the ceiling on the speed of a change (how fast the news arrives), common to all forces. Different questions.

SUMMARYMass sets the range, c sets the speed

A change in force travels at exactly \(c\) because the carrier has zero mass (photon, gluon, graviton) ── zero mass ↔ speed \(c\) ↔ infinite range is one package. When the carrier is heavy (W, Z), the range \(\lambda=\hbar/mc\) becomes short, but the speed of a change is kept at \(c\) as a ceiling. Mass sets the range, \(c\) sets the speed ── different questions. "Short-range, so slow" was a confusion of range and speed.

Episode 6 (Yukawa's range), Episode 10 (inverse-square), and Speed ① (a change is c) meshed here into one. Next time, the subtlest and most fascinating story ── "a static force carries no news." The force of a source moving at constant velocity appears to "track its current position instantly." But it carries no information and breaks no causality. Resolving virtual particles and the true nature of the apparent instantaneity, we close the trilogy on speed.

This document is No. ② of the "Force That Clicks" series bonus "The Speed of Force," a piece of reading for physics-loving high-school and university students. The following are established content: that when the mediating particle has zero mass the interaction is long-range (\(\propto1/r^2\)) and disturbances in the field propagate at the speed of light; that for a mediating particle of mass \(m\) the reach is limited in Yukawa fashion to \(\lambda=\hbar/mc\); but that the propagation speed of a signal (the leading edge of a change) is capped at \(c\) regardless of the mediating particle's mass. Reach (range) and propagation speed are independent concepts. A real mediating particle with mass moves slower than light, but the front velocity does not exceed \(c\) (we do not go into the distinction between phase velocity and group velocity). The figure is a schematic showing the key point that "the range depends on mass, while the leading-edge position does not." ── To print, use your browser's "Print" and "Save as PDF" (in the print version the slider and answers are frozen and hidden).

Print / Save as PDF: ⌘+P (Ctrl+P on Windows). On screen, use the slider to watch how raising the mass shrinks the range while the leading edge (the speed) doesn't move. Click "See the answer" to open each solution.