Force That ClicksEpisode 7 / Peeling the Nature of Force Off One Layer at a Time

Episode 6: force is an exchange of carriers → Episode 7: lining up the four forces on a single table and comparing them

Lining Up the Four Forces,
Dimensionlessly Gravity, electromagnetic, strong, weak. We want to compare their strengths ── but stating "strength" with units attached leaves nothing to compare.
Only the number with the units gone ── the coupling constant ── lets them line up fairly. And there the mystery of gravity, "the weakest yet dominant," comes into view.

Tools you'll need: the exchange picture from Episode 6, α from the sister series, orders of magnitude (logarithms) Strength can only be compared dimensionlessly

In Episode 6 we saw that all four forces run on the same mechanism ── "an exchange of carriers." So how do their strengths differ? Here the lesson of Episode 1 pays off ── the absolute value of a force (in newtons) depends on your choice of units, and as it stands it can't be compared. To line them up fairly, you have no choice but to measure with the number that has no units ── the coupling constant. The star of the sister series "Cosmology That Clicks," \(\alpha\) (the fine-structure constant ≈ 1/137), was precisely the "dimensionless strength" of the electromagnetic force. Line the four up dimensionlessly and the orders of magnitude are astonishingly far apart ── and then the mystery of why the weakest force, gravity, somehow rules the universe stands out in sharp relief.

01Strength can only be compared dimensionlessly

To answer "which is stronger, electromagnetism or gravity?", you have to put both on the same ruler. But the value of a force is in newtons, and change the units and the number changes too (Episodes 1 and 2). So for each force we use a coupling constant ── a ratio with the units gone capturing "how strongly that force acts between two elementary particles." For electromagnetism, that is \(\alpha=e^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar c\approx 1/137\).

ForceDimensionless strength (rough)CarrierRange
Strong force\(\alpha_s \sim 1\)GluonShort (confinement)
Electromagnetic\(\alpha \approx 1/137 \sim 10^{-2}\)PhotonInfinite (1/r²)
Weak force\(\sim 10^{-6}\) (effective at low energy)W, ZExtremely short
Gravity\(\alpha_G=\dfrac{G m_p^2}{\hbar c}\sim 10^{-38}\)Graviton (hypothetical)Infinite

The shock of this table is that the strengths are spread across about 36 orders of magnitude. Set the strong force to 1 and gravity is \(10^{-38}\) ── a 1 with 38 zeros after the decimal point. The difference is so vast it feels wrong to lump them under the single word "force." And gravity is, of the four, the weakest by a landslide.

02Why does the weakest force, gravity, rule the universe?

This is the crux of the episode. In daily life and across the cosmos, what holds us to the ground, keeps the Moon in orbit, builds the stars, and binds the galaxies together is gravity. The weakest of all, yet on large scales it wins outright. Why? The reason is not strength, but whether things cancel or pile up.

The heart of this episode ── does it cancel, or not?

Electromagnetism: charge comes in plus and minus, and matter is neutral. The more you gather, the more it cancels out, and the net is nearly zero. It's orders of magnitude stronger, yet in a large object it can't show its face.
Gravity: mass (energy) is positive only. There's no cancellation, so the more you gather, the more it just keeps piling up. On top of that, it reaches out to infinity.
So for a large, neutral lump (a planet, a star), it's gravity ── weak but never cancelling ── that wins.

In the figure below, watch what happens as you make the object larger (increase the number of particles): the net electromagnetic force stalls because of cancellation, while gravity keeps piling up and overtakes it at some size. Electromagnetism, which per particle is \(10^{36}\) times stronger, loses to gravity in a large object ── this is what "weakest yet dominant" really means.

Figure: make the object larger (horizontal: number of particles it contains, logarithmic) and gravity (never cancels, purple) piles up, while electromagnetism (neutral, cancels, orange) stalls. Eventually gravity overtakes it
Gravity (never cancels) Electromagnetism (neutral, cancels ── net)
◇ ◇ ◇

03What peeling it back revealed ── "strong/weak" is a dimensionless statement

The conclusion of Episode 7. The "strength" of the four forces can't be compared in newtons; it only carries meaning through the coupling constant, with the units gone. Episode 1's "the absolute value is a convention, the ratio is the physics" applied directly to comparing forces. And phrases like "gravity is weak" and "the strong force is strong" were pointing at the size of the dimensionless coupling all along. The sister series' \(\alpha\) was the electromagnetic version of that.

What lining up the four tells us

• Strength can be compared only dimensionlessly (\(\alpha_s\sim1,\ \alpha\sim10^{-2},\ \text{weak}\sim10^{-6},\ \alpha_G\sim10^{-38}\)).
• Whether a force is "dominant" isn't decided by strength alone ── what matters is whether it cancels (electromagnetism) or piles up (gravity) and its range.
• Each force's individuality (strength, range, carrier) gets one more layer peeled back next time, in the "running."

An honest line

The dimensionless strengths in the table are rough orders of magnitude. In particular, the weak force's "\(\sim10^{-6}\)" is an effective weakness at low energy because its carriers W and Z are heavy; its intrinsic coupling is comparable to electromagnetism (electroweak unification). The strong force's \(\alpha_s\sim1\), too, changes greatly with the energy you probe at, as we'll see next time. \(\alpha_G\) is the value using "proton mass against proton mass" as the reference; change the reference particle and the number changes (gravity depends on mass, so making it dimensionless requires a reference).

The figure is a schematic showing the contrast of "cancels / piles up," and it simplifies the relation between particle number and force (gravity ∝ N², while the electromagnetic net depends on the degree of neutrality). The particle number at which the crossover happens is conceptual too.

Practice problems
  1. Why do you need the coupling constant (dimensionless) to answer "which is stronger, electromagnetism or gravity"?
    See the answer
    The absolute value of a force is in newtons, and change the units and the number changes too, so it can't be compared (Episode 1). Only once you cast it as the dimensionless coupling constant can you fairly state which is larger.
  2. Gravity is the weakest (\(\sim10^{-38}\)), so why does it become dominant on the scale of planets and stars?
    See the answer
    Electromagnetism's plus and minus cancel, so in a neutral object the net is nearly zero, but gravity comes from mass (positive only), doesn't cancel, piles up, and moreover reaches out to infinity. It's decided not by strength but by "cancels or piles up."
  3. What, precisely, does the phrase "gravity is weak" refer to?
    See the answer
    That the dimensionless coupling constant \(\alpha_G\sim10^{-38}\) is smaller than the other forces' couplings by many orders of magnitude. It's a statement about the size of a ratio (dimensionless), not about the value of a force with units.

SummaryStrength is dimensionless; dominance is decided by cancellation

The strengths of the four forces can't be compared in newtons; they line up only through the coupling constant, with the units gone ── strong force \(\sim1\), electromagnetism \(\alpha\sim10^{-2}\), weak force \(\sim10^{-6}\), gravity \(\alpha_G\sim10^{-38}\). A spread of about 36 orders of magnitude. Episode 1's "the ratio is the physics" was the foundation for comparing forces. The sister series' \(\alpha\) is the electromagnetic version of this.

And the weakest force, gravity, rules the universe not through strength but because it piles up without cancelling. Electromagnetism, however many orders of magnitude stronger, is neutralized by its plus and minus and vanishes in a large object. Gravity piles up with mass and reaches out to infinity. ── Next time we'll see that this "strength" isn't a fixed value but runs with the energy you probe at. It's Episode 6 of the sister series' running, seen from the side of force.

This document is Episode 7 of the "Force That Clicks" series, a reading piece for physics-loving high-school and university students. Comparing the fundamental interactions by dimensionless coupling, electromagnetism's \(\alpha\approx1/137\), the strong force's \(\alpha_s\sim1\), the weak force's effective weakness at low energy (because the mediators W/Z are heavy), and gravity's \(\alpha_G=Gm_p^2/\hbar c\sim10^{-38}\) (proton-mass reference) are standard rough figures. That gravity is dominant macroscopically ── because mass is positive only and adds up without cancelling, whereas electromagnetism cancels in neutral matter ── is established understanding. The numbers are rough orders of magnitude, and the weak coupling and \(\alpha_s\) depend on the energy scale (Episode 8). The figure is a schematic showing "cancellation vs. addition"; the particle-number dependence and the crossover position are conceptual. ── To print, use your browser's "Print" and "Save as PDF" (in the print version, the slider and answers are frozen or hidden).

Print / save as PDF: ⌘+P (Ctrl+P on Windows). On screen, use the slider to watch gravity overtake electromagnetism as you make the object larger. Click "See the answer" to open each solution.