In Episode 1 we said news "walks." So then ── what decides that walking speed?
In Episode 1 we said that force travels through a field, and since a field only talks to its neighbors, news "walks" at the speed of light \(c\). So a naive question ── what decides that walking speed? Why 300,000 km per second, no faster and no slower? This episode's answer is disappointingly universal. The sound of a string, the waves of an earthquake, light ── the speed of transmission can all be written with the same single formula ── \(v=\sqrt{\text{stiffness}/\text{mass}}\). The stiffer, the faster; the heavier, the slower. That's all. And when you build this "stiffness" and "mass" for the electromagnetic field, \(c=1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0}\) just falls out. The why of "for some reason it travels at the speed of light" turns, this episode, into inevitability.
Pluck the left end of a taut string. A dip runs to the right. Let's break down this "speed at which the dip runs" as a game of telephone. When one point dips, it tries to pull its neighbor up. This restoring strength is the stiffness \(k\) (for a string, the tension). But the neighbor has an unwillingness to move. This is the mass \(m\) (for a string, its density). Stiffness urges "pass it to the neighbor fast," and mass hits the brakes with "don't rush." The result of this tug-of-war is the speed of transmission ──
Stiffness \(k\) is the numerator (bigger = faster), mass \(m\) is the denominator (bigger = slower). And both sit inside a square root ── quadruple the stiffness and the speed only doubles.
Why a square root, in one line. Stiffness \(k\) sets the "restoring force," mass \(m\) sets "how hard it is to accelerate." The speed of vibration (angular frequency) is \(\omega=\sqrt{k/m}\) ── the familiar spring pendulum. The wave speed is the speed at which that vibration transfers to the neighbor, so it wears the same \(\sqrt{k/m}\) face. The \(\sqrt{k/m}\) of a spring pendulum and the \(\sqrt{k/m}\) of a wave speed are the same thing.
With this one formula, you can read every "difference in speed" around you.
A wave traveling on a string (tension T, linear density μ)
$$v=\sqrt{\dfrac{T}{\mu}}\quad(\text{stiffness}=T,\ \text{mass}=\mu)$$Sound traveling through air or a solid (bulk modulus K, density ρ)
$$v=\sqrt{\dfrac{K}{\rho}}\quad(\text{stiffness}=K,\ \text{mass}=\rho)$$Tightening a guitar string (\(T\uparrow\)) raises the pitch because \(v\uparrow\). A thick string (\(\mu\uparrow\)) sounds low because \(v\downarrow\). Sound runs through iron about 15 times faster than through air because iron is "stiff (large \(K\)) and, in the ratio, light." The names differ, but the skeleton is always \(v=\sqrt{\text{stiffness}/\text{mass}}\).
So far, waves in visible matter. Now at last ── to the speed of light, running through a vacuum that should hold nothing.
The electromagnetic field also has "stiffness" and "mass." The electric field has a reluctance to store up charge, and this is the electrical stiffness (the reciprocal of the vacuum permittivity \(\varepsilon_0\), i.e. \(1/\varepsilon_0\)). The magnetic field has a stickiness = inertia resisting changes in current, and this is the magnetic mass (the vacuum permeability \(\mu_0\)). Put into the same skeleton ──
Stiffness \(=1/\varepsilon_0\), mass \(=\mu_0\). Even letter for letter, it is the same as the string's \(\sqrt{T/\mu}\).
Let's plug in numbers. Two constants measurable on a lab bench, with no connection to light ── \(\varepsilon_0=8.85\times10^{-12}\), \(\mu_0=1.26\times10^{-6}\) ──
Using no light at all, the speed computed from an electricity experiment and a magnetism experiment alone was the speed of light itself, which had been measured beforehand. This is Maxwell's trembling line of 1862 ── "This speed agrees exactly with the speed of light. We can hardly avoid the conclusion that light is an electromagnetic wave." The true identity of light was the electromagnetic field's game of telephone.
The figure below is a race. The top lane is a "spring chain" whose stiffness \(k\) and mass \(m\) you can freely change. The bottom lane is the reference: light traveling through a vacuum (speed \(c\), unchangeable). They start at the same time ── which reaches the finish line first?
Raise the stiffness \(k\) with the slider and the spring chain's pulse gets faster. Raise the mass \(m\) and it gets slower. The displayed speed ratio is exactly \(v/c=\sqrt{k/m}\). When \(k=m\) (the default), the ratio is 1 ── it runs neck and neck with light. When stiffness and mass balance, that field's wave has the same speed as light. "Why c" is: "c is that field's own \(\sqrt{k/m}\), set by the electromagnetic field's stiffness and mass."
Speed itself (m/s) has units. Strip the units and turn it into a ratio, and this episode's star appears ── compared to light, how much slower is that wave?
In a vacuum (the electromagnetic field with nothing added), \(n=1\) ── this is the ceiling. In glass or water, the electrons are shaken by the field and move along with it, adding extra "mass" so that \(v
Here is the heart of "the ceiling." A medium can only add extra mass (the inertia of the moving charges). Add mass and \(v\) drops, \(n\) rises ── so in a vacuum, i.e. when the extra mass is zero, the speed pins to its maximum \(c\). When nothing is added, it is fastest. Episode 6's Higgs field and next episode's mass are, in fact, both stories of "adding mass to a field" ── a field given mass becomes slower than \(c\), and even its reach shrinks. Conversely, a massless field (the photon) hits the ceiling of the ratio, runs at exactly \(c\), and reaches the infinite beyond. The why of "for some reason light-speed" was the inevitability that "the field's mass is zero, so \(\sqrt{k/m}\) hits the ceiling."
\(v=\sqrt{\text{stiffness}/\text{mass}}\) is a rigorous skeleton genuinely common to all waves ── strings, sound, electromagnetic waves, water waves (it comes from the wave equation). \(c=1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0}\), the refractive index \(n=c/v\geq1\), that a medium lowers \(v\), that the photon is massless and gives \(c\) ── all established physics.
Two points, honestly, though. ① The electromagnetic field is not a substance called the ether quivering. The 19th century imagined it so, but experiment (Michelson–Morley) denied it. \(\varepsilon_0,\mu_0\) are properties of the vacuum = the field itself, and "stiffness/mass" is a rigorous metaphor for the field (mathematically isomorphic to an electric circuit's \(v=1/\sqrt{LC}\)) ── take it that way. ② This episode explained "why that wave gives \(c\)," but "why \(c\) is this universe's absolute speed limit (no information can exceed \(c\))" is a deeper matter of relativity = the structure of spacetime, for another time. Here, get a firm grip on "a massless field has its \(\sqrt{k/m}\) reach the maximum."
What decides the speed of the news that "walked" in Episode 1? The answer is universal: the speed of any wave \(=\sqrt{\text{stiffness}/\text{mass}}=\sqrt{k/m}\). Stiffness in the numerator (faster), mass in the denominator (slower), both inside a square root. String \(\sqrt{T/\mu}\), sound \(\sqrt{K/\rho}\), electromagnetic field \(\sqrt{(1/\varepsilon_0)/\mu_0}=1/\sqrt{\varepsilon_0\mu_0}=c\) ── the names differ but the skeleton is one. Maxwell got \(c\) from the electric and magnetic constants alone and saw that light is an electromagnetic wave.
Strip the units into a ratio and you get the refractive index \(n=c/v\geq1\). A medium can only add extra mass to the field, so \(v\) drops and \(n>1\). Hence in a massless vacuum the speed pins to its maximum \(c\). The why of "for some reason it travels at the speed of light" was the inevitability that "the carrier (photon) has zero mass, so \(\sqrt{k/m}\) hits the ceiling." The unit-bearing \(T,\varepsilon_0,\mu_0\) are stage sets; what decides the physics is the ratios \(\sqrt{k/m}\) and \(n\) ── the second step in reading a field through ratios.
Print / make PDF: ⌘+P (Ctrl+P on Windows). On screen, the stiffness k and mass m sliders change the speed of the spring chain's wave (= the speed ratio to light √(k/m)). "See the answer" opens the solutions.